Who Was Innocent – Trayvon Martin, George Zimmerman
Hello all…. I am writing this blog post for a couple of reasons. The first actually being because out the outpouring of complaint against the judgement of innocent for George Zimmerman in the Trayvon Martin / George Zimmerman case. Because I have a bottom line message for Mr. Zimmerman, the survivor. Because of the recent Gun Control debates again after the Sandy Hook School shootings/slayings. Because of Stand Your Ground Laws. Because of how the Free Press itself seemed to have duped the Public on this one in advance and leading to more elongated and even profitable ongoing news surrounding an anticipated near riot nationwide even in extreme of a not guilty verdict. Because at the trial and end of things, all the truth was coming out that was previously all blurred innuendo and half truths and bended truths and just misguidance altogether and mostly by the Free Press on this one.
The Free Press rushed this into an apparent racial slaying, pre-meditated even perhaps via innuendo. Some innocent child-man eating candy and sipping a soda getting slain via handgun for no reason whatsoever. There cute little “leaking” the words of Mr.George Zimmerman as using the other “N-” word and there you are. They seemed to all completely side with the “rush to judgement” – and looking back seems quite intentional on this one as soliciting and even aiding protest in advance of an innocent verdict for simply more news they get to do and more self aggrandizing fame and more advertising dollars to boot perhaps.
The truth coming out in the end, referring to the actual specifics of medical reports and who did what etc, made me suddenly wonder if Mr.George Zimmerman was actually a political target by some leftist conservative Republican clan attempting gains of the “Black Vote” in Florida by the apparent secondary decision of prosecuting Mr.George Zimmerman. Not far off, to allow to die in prison – leave George Z. rot in prison – for their advancement, as some and Tea Party jargonism seems promoting parricide http://www.thefreedictionary.com/parricide (parent killing) in some vein – as appealing to the Youth and Middle America vote to end Social Security and simply throw all their Grand Parents into the streets even if suffering life threatening illnesses – cut them off altogether and leave them to die in the streets – to save that miniscule few dollars weekly in the paycheck and for corporates to shovel out a few more bucks as increased profit to shareholders gaining love for money praise. Vote for us for those few extra bucks you can squeeze off to make your mortgage or rent or car payments etc.
We are all aware of the nutz crazy rave in America running back and forth between the two sides in cable/satellite News – namely Fox and NBC – as one too leftist (conservative) and one, perhaps too rightest (liberal). I grew up as a die-hard JFK Kennedy Democrat so you know and is why my surprise in this case is – hearing the truth finally that leaves me with a whole honest view as the juror would be, and the outcome of that true evidence a real mindblower as to the correct judgment as opposed to the crapola that was originally spreading as a pending avalanche in the Free Press. This was almost, almost, becoming on the magnitude of the O. J. Simpson Trial. It may still I hope not.
I have some things you may want to consider and because I see some wrong going on and in the eyes of the law which we need obey and particularly when they are right even if you do not like it for any reason. Some may walk away from this in disbelief of opinions here, some may learn something here or give to reflect again.
As growing up in the Viet Nam Era in America and ALL the protests the world has heard of, seen, or even participated in….. you can take it from a veteran voice that if you are speaking wrongly and demanding wrongly – speaking prematurely – just demanding what you want regardless of the law and facts, well you are not going to get anywhere and you are certainly not going to get what you want if it is contrary to the truth and facts and Law and legal judgment. A childish temper tantrum is most times punished or ignored to the intention of teaching the disobedience will not prevail over right and moral. This is some necessary food for thought I am seeing of the protestors in the news and their positions.
What is aghast is how the Free Press began by painting Trayvon Martin as a young innocent child even as pure as the driven snow, skipping down the Primrose Lane of lovely care free innocent life sipping a soda and munching candy. What was revealed in the trial beyond the shadow of a doubt was that was the furthest thing from the truth at those moments.
If you will, take some advice and read this from God’s Word and closing words….
BOOK OF JAMES (New Testament)
1 My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons.
2 For if there come unto your assembly a man with a gold ring, in goodly apparel, and there come in also a poor man in vile raiment;
3 And ye have respect to him that weareth the gay clothing, and say unto him, Sit thou here in a good place; and say to the poor, Stand thou there, or sit here under my footstool:
4 Are ye not then partial in yourselves, and are become judges of evil thoughts?
5 Hearken, my beloved brethren, Hath not God chosen the poor of this world rich in faith, and heirs of the kingdom which he hath promised to them that love him?
6 But ye have despised the poor. Do not rich men oppress you, and draw you before the judgment seats?
7 Do not they blaspheme that worthy name by the which ye are called?
8 If ye fulfil the royal law according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself, ye do well:
9 But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors.
10 For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.
11 For he that said, Do not commit adultery, said also, Do not kill. Now if thou commit no adultery, yet if thou kill, thou art become a transgressor of the law.
12 So speak ye, and so do, as they that shall be judged by the law of liberty.
13 For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment.
14 What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save him?
15 If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food,
16 And one of you say unto them, Depart in peace, be ye warmed and filled; notwithstanding ye give them not those things which are needful to the body; what doth it profit?
17 Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.
18 Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works.
19 Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble.
20 But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?
21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar?
22 Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?
23 And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.
24 Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.
25 Likewise also was not Rahab the harlot justified by works, when she had received the messengers, and had sent them out another way?
26 For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.
Here is that verse I am referring to…..
4 Are ye not then partial in yourselves, and are become judges of evil thoughts?
….Becoming judges of evil thoughts is this “food for thought” to examine yourselves here. Are you putting aside facts for feelings? Are you choosing what you want and wished is your new law now you want? Are you deliberately and knowingly reading into the results for a different outcome in the case because it is what you think you believe about Mr. George Zimmerman? And who are you to know this – his inner thoughts or the flip side – Mr. Trayvon Martin’s inner thoughts that day?
Are you God now? Some gifted mind reader? You know what either was thinking at the moment? Rascist? Thief murderer? None of the words going on out here are ANYTHING but speculation and thoughts and wishes and guesses – NOTHING truthful proven beyond the shadow of a doubt in the judgment which did in this case.
It did show demeanor http://www.thefreedictionary.com/demeanor
READ….. ARE YOU GOD KNOWING ALL THOUGHTS OF ALL?
9 The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?
10 I the Lord search the heart, I try the reins, even to give every man according to his ways, and according to the fruit of his doings.
Psalms 94:11 The Lord knoweth the thoughts of man….
I Chronicles 28:9 …for the Lord searcheth all hearts, and understandeth all the imaginations of the thoughts: if thou seek him, he will be found of thee; but if thou forsake him, he will cast thee off for ever.
8 For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the Lord.
9 For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.
I Corinthians 3
18 Let no man deceive himself. If any man among you seemeth to be wise in this world, let him become a fool, that he may be wise.
19 For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness.
20 And again, The Lord knoweth the thoughts of the wise, that they are vain.
21 Therefore let no man glory in men. For all things are yours;
Psalms 7:9 Oh let the wickedness of the wicked come to an end; but establish the just: for the righteous God trieth the hearts and reins.
You can wrongly go the way of saying George Z. was just waiting for the chance to shoot a Black American. How would you know? Guessing is law now? I used to own a Bloodhound with AKC Pedigree Papers and these are sometimes called “coon dogs” meaning they do well against and hunting racoons. They have the heart of a lion and will not back down to anything, nor probably even a lion or bear actually. I would not doubt it. They are very brave. But that phrase, does it mean all drug users who are thieves for their habits? Did it mean racially as that other “n-word”? Well? Do you know George Z. ‘s inner thoughts now as God?
You can wrongly go the way of saying Trayvon M. was a thief and violent murderer just waiting for a chance of violence and/or murder against a Community Town Watch member or Captain or other law abiding citizen when the opportunity presented itself seemingly of not getting caught doing it, and here while patrolling for thieving with a perfect “short cut” alibi. So you are God now and know all this as fact? Can you even answer if Trayvon M. knew he was committing the crime of Criminal Trespass in walking through Private Property as it was not Public Throughway – the “short cut”?
WHAT WAS PROVEN BEYOND THE SHADOW OF A DOUBT LEGALLY/LAWFULLY – IS FACT…..
So the truth came out in the buckets each day of the trial with daily reports. The truth as facts that were facts beyond a reasonable doubt – beyond the shadow of a doubt are facts and constitute judgment.
The medical facts showed George Z. suffered deadly force injuries severe enough to, beyond a reasonable doubt, use deadly force for self protection.
The medical facts showed beyond a reasonable doubt that Trayvon M. had traces of illegal marijuana in his system/body – although being portayed as Snow White or Little Red Riding Hood or any like analogy as a young innocent child even as pure as the driven snow, skipping down the Primrose Lane of lovely care free innocent life sipping a soda and munching candy being so innocent without a carnal mind or thought at all. Oh please! we found out. Beyond reasonable doubt as fact, Trayvon M. applied deadly force against another human being that moment. Trayvon M. was breaking the law as criminally trespassing through private property. Trayvon M. was breaking the law as in pocession of illegal marijuana drug/substance.
The demeanor of Trayvon M. proven beyond reasonable doubt and is fact then was he would use deadly force in this moment. Whether it was a mistake of too much force as deadly and/or even due to inebreation can not be determined but that he reacted this way in this moment shows his demeanor in this case. What may be a second tradgedy here is his mother who apparently denied her son was ever involved in drugs or stealing or violence. What was proven beyond reasonable doubt and is fact was her son was of demeanor that he would use deadly force in such this occasion. Shocking then no doubt. It could still be argued he was victim of second hand marijuana smoke not knowing it was indeed illegal marijuana. It was not proven he was a chronic drug user. It was proven beyond reasonable doubt and is fact he was commensurately inebriated as was apparent by the small trace – as to whether residual from earlier moderate to heavy use in those commensurate hours wearing off as leaving the trace amount found in him and then at that level of inebration. Actual full clarity of that I am sure was available. One point could be an aggravated deadly force response by Trayvon M. due to the effects of the marijuana effect wearing almost totally off leaving with a headache and craving harder substance and aggravated feeling as no longer euphoric and towards somewhat exhaustion, tiredness – does not want to be disturbed. Real world calls that “crashing”. With the trace amount it is possible he was crashing from an hour or hours earlier of getting high in other words.
I can sympathize with the mother of Trayvon M. as when I was young I got in trouble mainlining meth (shooting speed in veins with needle) and went to jail for stealing and an in-patient drug rehabilitation program for over a year were I actually ended up as Layman Assistant Residential Therapist. My mother almost to her dying day could just not accept that I was a “hype” – a junkie shooting dope with needles drug user – only not heroin but the opposite stuff, speed (Crystal Meth, Biker Meth, Monster, etc etc etc). I could never figure her denial to this day. I was fortunate of God and Country I was given a second chance to live a law abiding productive life and did. Again here you can say Trayvon M. was as an addict with at least marijuana and was stealing to support his habit and call in the IRS to prove he consumed more than he could pay for, and so stole for it or sold it for profit to pay for his own consumption of it. But it was not proven beyond reasonable doubt and is fact that he had a trace of the substance in his system at time of death that I heard in reports. It can and is proven beyond reasonable doubt and is fact he at least was under its influence once – that moment.
The demeanor of George Z. was proven beyond reasonable doubt and is fact he disdained thieves being in the Community Watch as inferred from his sentence “so and so ….never learn their lesson…” or what it was exactly said. Again a raccoon is as generally a nocturnal animal getting into everything and taking what it wants and will attack back. If this was said it can refer to a thief as any color. It was not proven beyond reasonable doubt and is fact he was of demeanor as racial at the moment of conflict. It was proven beyond reasonable doubt and is fact that all of George Z.’s statements made were not anything but stating self defense and was proven beyond reasonable doubt and is fact it was.
MY QUESTION / COMMENT TO GEORGE Z. …..
In the United States Constitution it is clearly the spirit of the wording that the People’s Right to Keep and Bear Arms is CLEARLY intended as National Defense. Not local Militia (Police, State Police etc). It might be construed drug usage and even thieves may be of an international threat or alien influence opposed to America. History will show drug addicts are victims of foreign influence, not perpetrators. Historically, thieves have never amounted to more than Hole In The Wall Jesse James or Al Capone and those after him. National threat?
And so I had just did a Podcast about Gun legislation and rights from the Sandy Hook massacre.
This incident has jumped back at the soul of this across the nation. It is my opinion in the podcast if you listen, that no citizen should have the right other than self protection in their own home as bottom line and you MUST listen to the whole cast to see how that is arrived at objectively. It covers this episode in America – and should Americans bear arms fighting all the drive by spraying with bullets attacks and murders – even innocent by-standers? Street sweepers in revenge assassination? The answer, we know already. Not without professional training as is the law for the United States Armed Forces and all Local Police etc etc etc. The citizenry would do more harm than good considering friendly fire casualties and property damage.
In the podcast you understand ALL arms are under Congressional Regulation first. It is NOT in the US Constitution Americans have the Right of Self Defense. This has been extension by inference of the law and grace of the American Government. The Right to Keep and Bear Arms is for NATIONAL DEFENSE and STATE DEFENSE against invasion.
George Z., were you defending America that day? Or were you under the grace of American and State Government to defend your own life? I didn’t look up the particulars of Engagement, with whom turned out to be Trayvon Martin, but I will assume if you were proper in any manner you identified yourself as member or captain of the Community Watch (which by the way was founded here in Philadelphia, my town, as “Town Watch”) – whatever the appropriate title – and that you asked the subject to remain still, as the Police have been dispatched per report and will be here momentarily to question the subject.
“The Town watch program is similar to that of the Neighborhood watch, the major difference is that the Town Watch tend to actively patrol in pseudo-uniforms, i.e. marked vests or jackets and caps, and is equipped with two way radios to directly contact the local police. The Town Watch serves as an auxiliary to the police which provides weapons (if any), equipment, and training. The town watch usually returns their gear at the end of their duty.”
And here will begin the great debate no doubt now that all these “Town Watch” groups throughout America should in NO WAY have the right to bear arms and self defense while in the service of same. These are NOT POLICE and should NOT be regarded as such either in name and respect and honor OR armament – having NO PROFESSIONAL TRAINING required BY LAW for their “superiors” the Local Police militia. I think people’s reaction as wann-a-bee cop may apply to all. BUT don’t leave yet, I am not done.
CONSIDER THIS GEORGE Z. ….. I got back up of my words….
The grace of the American Government is found in Community Town Watch areas as extra eyes and ears of the Law as SPOTTERS and not even trained in this criminologist area. About the only qualifications these are equal to is simply being a law abiding American Citizen and trusted – as an American Juror is. That’s it. Observers doing there best to judge and report right and wrong without being professionally trained as professionals of and for this part of Society. Confrontation in this can be deadly and less and is why it is NOT to be engaged other than by a Professional trained to do so LEGALLY. These should and are to be ONLY observers, reporting perceived crime by who and where and updates as to where they are if they move away right over 911 like any other untrained citizen does.
An even slightly more aggressive than that (observer) association as far as citizen arrest are…..
CONSIDER THE GUARDIAN ANGELS (FAMOUS UNARMED TOWN WATCH ASSOCIATION IN WORST CRIME AREA IN USA – ORIGINALLY NEW YORK)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
PHOTO MIAMI GUARDIAN ANGELS
THESE FOLLOW BEST THE GRACE INTENDED BY THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT AND PEOPLE. THE REST FOR THE REST HAVE BEEN DULY ELECTED AND SWORN IN AND ATTEND CONTINUALLY. THE REST PARTICULARLY IF ARMED SHOULD BE BANNED IMMEDIATELY LEAVING THE GUARDIAN ANGELS AS ROLE MODEL OR ANYTHING WEAKER.
and there is no constitutional authority for “citizen’s arrest” – as is false imprisonment and kidnap as violating citizen rights of free assembly. Citizens have the right to possess their persons effects and property and can defend their lives to the death against injury and murder, but they have no right to detain anyone as they are not Officers of the Law. ONLY these have been duly elected an sworn into duty and are legally endowed to suspend legally a suspect’s right to assembly via arrest for crime per probable cause. The US Constitution does not extend this to citizens. However it does extend National Defense to citizens in the Right To Keep and Bear Arms. Obviously the US Constitution does not extend to Citizens the right to detain enemies of the constitution whereby in defense of the nation if there are unarmed enemies – they can not force them anywhere in detention awaiting Armed Forces to pick them up. Treason under the US Constitution can ONLY be defined by citizens as …..
Article Three Section 3 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Three_of_the_United_States_Constitution
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
TWO OR MORE WITNESSES ARE NEEDED OF CITIZENS TO CONVICT A TREASONER OF THE WHICH THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO DEFEND AGAINST AS INVASION WITH RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS. CITIZENS DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO DETAIN OR SET UP COURT OR JAIL FOR INVADERS COMMITTING TREASON – TREASON BEING DEFINED BY THE US CONSTITUTION AS LEVYING WAR AGAINST THE UNITED STATES. ALL OTHERS ARE BROUGHT TO COURT WHERE CITIZEN WITNESSES MAY TESTIFY. CITIZENS HAVE NO COURTS POWERS ANYWHERE IN BETWEEN AND THEREFORE HAVE NO RIGHT TO CITIZENS ARREST. ONLY THE COURTS AND OFFICERS HAVE RIGHT BY PROBABLE CAUSE TO SUSPEND THE RIGHT OF ASSEMBLY WHICH IS DETAINMENT AND ARREST. CITIZENS HAVE RIGHTS TO THEIR PROPERTY PERSONS AND EFFECTS AND TO DEFEND AGAINST DEADLY FORCE AND DAMAGE TO LIFE AND LIMB BUT NOT TO SUSPEND THE RIGHT OF ASSEMBLY WHICH IS DETAINMENT AND ARREST.
I guess this will all end up in protests and hearings by the Supreme Court and action by Congress. So George Z. – still think you had any right to touch Trayvon M. in the name of the law? Let alone shoot someone engaging them, not by any Town Watch law, but by common Stand Your Ground law? They let you go. It is apparently the law in Florida for the moment. Apparently you have been found innocent by reason of self defense. In my opinion you have to prove to yourself, God, and Nation you did not solicit Aggravated Homicide secretly with intent of deadly defense. Who jumped who? Only you, God, Jesus Christ, the Holy Spirit, and just maybe maybe the Devil know the truth. Maybe soon you will be able to or want to share that with the nation somewhere down the line. Ease the tensions. End the doubts. If you are not inclined, I suggest getting baptized into Christianity and become reborn. It will for sure make you honest and wise! Knowing what to say and when. God teaches us in the Holy Bible in the New Testament, the Gospel of Jesus Christ, to confess sins among each other. This doesn’t mean list them one by one – no not at all. It means more as general faults that sin or handfuls of instances of sin or transgression of God’s laws occurred from – faults, ignorance of laws or just willing sinful behavior. It guides us to make amends as we can wisely. Not re-opening old wounds of hurt, but simply try and restore in a smart mature way perhaps that which was stolen or taken or destroyed and so on.
AND FINALLY, HERE IS OUR DIRECTION FROM GOD’S WORD….. SPEAK RIGHT – DO RIGHT
Proverbs Chapter 16
1 The preparations of the heart in man, and the answer of the tongue, is from the Lord.
2 All the ways of a man are clean in his own eyes; but the Lord weigheth the spirits.
3 Commit thy works unto the Lord, and thy thoughts shall be established.
4 The Lord hath made all things for himself: yea, even the wicked for the day of evil.
5 Every one that is proud in heart is an abomination to the Lord: though hand join in hand, he shall not be unpunished.
6 By mercy and truth iniquity is purged: and by the fear of the Lord men depart from evil.
7 When a man’s ways please the Lord, he maketh even his enemies to be at peace with him.
8 Better is a little with righteousness than great revenues without right.
9 A man’s heart deviseth his way: but the Lord directeth his steps.
10 A divine sentence is in the lips of the king: his mouth transgresseth not in judgment.
AND KING DAVID WROTE (father of Solomon)….
A Psalm of David.
1 Judge me, O Lord; for I have walked in mine integrity: I have trusted also in the Lord; therefore I shall not slide.
2 Examine me, O Lord, and prove me; try my reins and my heart.
3 For thy lovingkindness is before mine eyes: and I have walked in thy truth.
4 I have not sat with vain persons, neither will I go in with dissemblers.
5 I have hated the congregation of evil doers; and will not sit with the wicked.
6 I will wash mine hands in innocency: so will I compass thine altar, O Lord:
7 That I may publish with the voice of thanksgiving, and tell of all thy wondrous works.
8 Lord, I have loved the habitation of thy house, and the place where thine honour dwelleth.
9 Gather not my soul with sinners, nor my life with bloody men:
10 In whose hands is mischief, and their right hand is full of bribes.
11 But as for me, I will walk in mine integrity: redeem me, and be merciful unto me.
12 My foot standeth in an even place: in the congregations will I bless the Lord.
Addendum….. President Barak Obama has commented “…We are a Nation of Laws…” . (referring to the Jury Verdict)
Among the Scales of Justice there is Truth and Fact. We have the two weights, the two sides of the scales resulting in the Judgment – Innocent. On the one side, Martin is found as in the act of homicide, responding to the presence of Zimmerman with lethal deadly force. On the other side of the scales we have Zimmerman found as returning deadly force, shooting in self defense resulting in death. In the Scales of Justice, Judgment by Truth and Fact, we as the Jurors see that unless Zimmerman had acted in self defense he would have been victim of homicide – dead. These are the reported Facts and Truth rendering Judgment in the Scales of Justice in American Law.
There remains a strong feeling or suspicion against that. If we view from any type Criminologist, or Phsychologist, or Phsychiatrist – any type qualified opinion in the area of crime and behavior, it seems too much of a jump in crime for a 17 year old juvenile with possibly apparently a light juvenile record even, to go from occasional marajuana use and possible one or couple thefts with no apparent gang membership activity etc – seems too much of a jump from a normal 17 year old juvenile who got off-track somewhat with marajuana experimenting to then the next crime being jumping all the way up the scale to complete physical violent attack and violent enough as becoming then lethal deadly force – killing another person. These are at opposite poles, opposite ends of crime and behavior. In this case, the next more serious crime for this juvenile scenario might be along the lines of burgarly in some fashion or degree as breaking into homes or cars or stores with no one in them to steal mechandise, property of cash value to then perhaps purchase drugs and NOT armed robbery. But the jump here seems from a “weekend warrior” type behavior of sneaking several marajuana cigarettes (joints) on the weekend with friends and maybe one or two in the middle of the week even – almost as a “casual recreational user” – jumping all the way to murderer in the assumption of not wanting to get caught “holding” (having illicit drugs on person). That behavior is generally as by any major illegal drug dealer in great volume resulting in great imprisonment time behind bars if caught – NOT some misdemeanor small amount punishable by fine. It is too much of a jump and too much of an overkill.
BUT if we take away that weight from the Scales of Justice – take away Martin was in the act of committing homicide – we are left with the one side of innocent G. Zimmerman. So to even the Scales of Justice we must take away this weight. If Martin was not in the act of committing Homicide, being stopped in the act of killing Zimmerman ONLY by Zimmerman’s self defense use of a handgun – judged legally, THEN Zimmerman was NOT victim of a deadly lethal-force physical beating (beating to death with bare hands) by Martin. Either Zimmerman’s physical injuries were self inflicted or occurred elsewhere previously and very recent. It seems the proper line if the City was truly trying to make case against Zimmerman as guilty that the few questions would have directly been in challenging medical evidence as “Is it not possible Mr. Zimmerman approached Mr. Martin and bashed his own nose and fell to the ground bashing his own head on the sidewalk, all the time holding Mr. Martin and then rose and shot him?” “Is it not possible Mr.Zimmerman’s wounds were self-inflicted?” “Is it not possible Mr.Zimmerman had received these wounds just previously in a described same type altercation whereby Mr.Zimmerman was being beat to death within an inch of his life and let go and Mr.Zimmerman afterwards approached Mr.Martin and shot him dead with no physical contact except to perhaps grab him and throw him to the ground and step on his hand?”
So the two weights in the Scales of Justice. We remove the one weight and say Martin was not in the act of homicide via physical beating to death of victim, THEN we have to remove the other and accuse Zimmerman as being a liar and falsely swearing as to all his injuries and how and when they occurred. We are left with pre-meditated murder one. If Martin is innocent then Zimmerman is guilty. Considering Zimmerman’s background then is that too much of a jump in criminal behavior to be believable? That he falsified or lied about injuries and committed murder out of contempt for Martin and anyone like him? That is the other responsible question.
This case seemed too light, not exhaustively pursued. Not comprehensive. I followed the O.J. Simpson Case and did not miss a second, as was broadcasted live in full, and kept daily notes. I believed O.J. was innocent and so did the Jury. Here admittedly I skimmed but waited until the end when the actual Trial reports came out with actual content of case. Something is missing. Something seems very light. In the very case of self defense whereby there is a homicide, BOTH backgrounds of BOTH subjects have to presented exhaustively with all appropriate analysis of both. There has been a homicide with only one person’s word as to how it occurred.
Lethal deadly force as self defense legally is in some vein related to capital offenses in America whereby the punishment is death for the crimes and is the Law of the Land regardless of any States wishes to the contrary as they are legally obligated to have in place a republican form of governement of the US Constitution ONLY. Whereby two witnesses or more are necessary for conviction of Treason as Due Process in America with aspect of death penalty, there is also actual Declaration of War as defense of the Nation against Treason as defined as levying war against America – the world as witness.
But here simply Mr. George Zimmerman’s statement of the facts seemed the only acceptance of truth of the events. This is an inequality in the Law and Scales of Justice. It is unaccebtable in Christian religion as well – there must be at least two witnesses in cases. …..
DEUTERONOMY Chapter 17
6 At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses, shall he that is worthy of death be put to death; but at the mouth of one witness he shall not be put to death.
This case needs more intense scrutiny and review and apparently an appropriate retrial of facts. It is simply unbelievable T. Martin intended homicide by I would estimate virtually all qualified opinion.
SPECIAL REPLY…. THIS HAS BEEN A POSSIBLE DANGEROUS PRECEDENT – THE SLAYING OF TRAYVON MARTIN IN FLORIDA – WHICH COULD (or has?) ESCALTE TO DANGEROUS DEADLY VIGILANTE-ISM IN AMERICA BY THESE CITIZEN WATCH GROUPS WHICH ARE NOT DULY SWORN IN OFFICERS OF THE JUSTICE SYSTEM OF AMERICA (POLICE). IT SHOULD BE REDRESS FOR GRIEVANCE AND LAW (actually is) THAT NO CITIZEN OR CITIZEN GROUP SHOULD HAVE ANY POWERS AS AGENT OR OFFICERS OF THE COURT OTHER THAN NORMAL CRIME REPORTING TO POLICE AS ANY CITIZEN. THEY SHOULD NOT BE ABLE TO BEAR ARMS IN DEFENSE OF RESIDENTIAL LIFE LIMB AND PROPERTY. THEY SHOULD HAVE NO POWER OF ARREST OR DETAINMNET.
THE DANGERS….. WE REMEMBER AND CALL TO REMEMBERENCE IN RECENT HISTORY THE DEATH SQUAD STREET SWEEPERS IN SOUTH AMERICA AND AS RECENT HISTORY…..
“In its 2003 and 2002 world reports, Human Rights Watch reported the existence of death squads in several Venezuelan states, involving members of the local police, the DISIP and the National Guard. These groups were responsible for the extrajudicial killings of civilians and wanted or alleged criminals, including street criminals, looters and drug users.”
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
EVERYONE HAS HEARD OF THIS DANGEROUS DEADLY ESCALATION IN OUR PREVIOUS 1960s GENERATION BY OUR OWN NATIONAL GUARD IN OHIO – THE KENT STATE UNIVERSITY MASSACRE MAY 04 1970 – UNARMED COLLEGE STUDENTS SHOT DEAD 4, WOUNDED 9. – THE “KENT STATE MASSACRE”
Kent State shootings
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
eMinister of eChurchofPhiladelphia.Org
Outreach – ChristianEministry.Com
Bible Studies: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ChristianEministry/
Forums / Studies Posted:
eChurchOfPhiladelphia.Org eChurch Forums