Tag Archives: podcasts

Our social network launch – Pavilion of Christian Churches Welcomes All


Our social network launch – Pavilion of Christian Churches Welcomes All

MISSION
Pavilion of Christian Churches Welcomes All: Catholic, Protestant (majority of Protestants are members of just a handful of denominational families: Adventists, Anglicanism, Baptist, Calvinism (Reformed churches), Lutheranism, Methodist, Pentecostalism, more), Presbyterian, Episcopalian, Mormon, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Nazarines, more.

 

Luke 1:1 Forasmuch as many have taken in hand to set forth in order a declaration of those things which are most surely believed among us, 2 Even as they delivered them unto us, which from the beginning were eyewitnesses, and ministers of the word; 3 It seemed good to me also, having had perfect understanding of all things from the very first, to write unto thee in order, most excellent Theophilus, 4 That thou mightest know the certainty of those things, wherein thou hast been instructed.

I Corinthians 12:27 Now ye are the body of Christ, and members in particular. 28 And God hath set some in the church, first apostles, secondarily prophets, thirdly teachers, after that miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, governments, diversities of tongues.

 

Our Beliefs: https://echurchofphiladelphia.com/our-beliefs/

[Administrator EChurch Online eChurchOfPhiladelhia.Com]

Our Beliefs Authorized King James Holy Bible http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorized_King_James_Version   Traditional of the Common and True Faith is the Authorized King James Version only, as the exact translation of the Scriptures from the Hebrew/Jew language into English speaking – being delivered, published, and circulated as the Word of God holding the Gospel of Jesus Christ as the only Salvation via the New Covenant of God. Christianity, Christian.

 

NAMESAKE } PAVILION FROM HOLY BIBLE

Jeremiah 43:10 And say unto them, Thus saith the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel; Behold, I will send and take Nebuchadrezzar the king of Babylon, my servant, and will set his throne upon these stones that I have hid; and he shall spread his royal pavilion over them.

Psalms 31:20 Thou shalt hide them in the secret of thy presence from the pride of man: thou shalt keep them secretly in a pavilion from the strife of tongues. 21 Blessed be the Lord: for he hath shewed me his marvellous kindness in a strong city.

Psalms 27:5 For in the time of trouble he shall hide me in his pavilion: in the secret of his tabernacle shall he hide me; he shall set me up upon a rock. 6 And now shall mine head be lifted up above mine enemies round about me: therefore will I offer in his tabernacle sacrifices of joy; I will sing, yea, I will sing praises unto the Lord.  7 Hear, O Lord, when I cry with my voice: have mercy also upon me, and answer me.

Psalms 18:9 He [God] bowed the heavens also, and came down: and darkness was under his feet. 10 And he rode upon a cherub, and did fly: yea, he did fly upon the wings of the wind. 11 He made darkness his secret place; his pavilion round about him were dark waters and thick clouds of the skies. 12 At the brightness that was before him his thick clouds passed, hail stones and coals of fire. 13 The Lord also thundered in the heavens, and the Highest gave his voice; hail stones and coals of fire. 14 Yea, he sent out his arrows, and scattered them; and he shot out lightnings, and discomfited them. 15 Then the channels of waters were seen, and the foundations of the world were discovered at thy rebuke, O Lord, at the blast of the breath of thy nostrils. 16 He sent from above, he took me, he drew me out of many waters. 17 He delivered me from my strong enemy, and from them which hated me: for they were too strong for me. 18 They prevented me in the day of my calamity: but the Lord was my stay.

 

II Samuel 22:11 And he rode upon a cherub, and did fly: and he was seen upon the wings of the wind. 12 And he made darkness pavilions round about him, dark waters, and thick clouds of the skies. 13 Through the brightness before him were coals of fire kindled. 14 The Lord thundered from heaven, and the most High uttered his voice.

 

Revisionists;

Paraphrase, Revised Modern English Edition, Revised New Testament Greek Interpretations Versions… (Bible originally written in Hebrew and Aramaic in the Old Testament, and Koine Greek in the New Testament – translated diligently into English by the Christian King James Commission to produce the only authorized English version of the Authorized King James Holy Bible).

 

Paraphrase Bibles http://www.learnthebible.org/paraphrase-bibles.html

My question is about paraphrase bibles. My Pastor likes to use one when he preaches. I work under this man in the ministry. My concern is if we teach or preach the word of God from a paraphrase bible, how will sinners know the truth of the individual words? A paraphrase bible is one that allows the greatest level of liberty in translation. In fact, translation is probably too strong a word for many of the paraphrase bibles out there.

Among paraphrase bibles, I am most familiar with the Amplified Bible. I have called it the Multiple Choice Bible because it tends to give a string of synonymous words or phrases in order to give numerous ideas as to what the verse might be saying. Unfortunately, it tends to confuse the sincere Bible student by giving a myriad of choices. For the creative teacher who needs evidence for his own unique doctrine, this bible is a storehouse of choices. If you do not like what the Bible says or if you simply need proof for a particular point, this paraphrase will often give you just what you need. But in reality, it makes God sound like a wishy-washy deity who must leave the real meaning of truth up to each person’s whim.

Other paraphrase bibles include Good News for Modern Man and the Living Bible. These bibles mold God’s word into a contemporary fusion of hip and political correctness. The text is “translated” according to liberal interpretation and modern nonsense. The lost and the spiritually immature often love these versions because they are fun and easy to read. It does not matter that God never made His Bible fun and easy to read–at least not from cover to cover. There are simple portions and there are difficult portions. There are joyous sections and there are plenty of heavy portions of scripture. The paraphrase relegates God’s holy words to an unimportant side-issue. How people feel when they read the version–that is the deciding factor for most modern paraphrases. I am sure that there are many modern paraphrases with which I am not familiar. As men get bolder and bolder with manipulating the words of the holy God, more and more modern versions are truly paraphrases. The dynamic equivalency doctrine of many modern versions is just a fancy way of saying paraphrase. It means that the text should be translated in such a way as to have the same effect on modern readers of English as it had on ancient readers of Hebrew and Greek. This sounds good, but it is a matter of interpretation. It means that translators must be confident that they know exactly what God was saying to the ancient recipients of the Bible text. The translators must also know exactly what effect these words had on them. Then, they must be able to determine what words will have the same effect on modern readers in another language and put the text in those words. This is not translation per se. It is interpretation. It means that the reader of these bibles must totally trust the “translators” to put the right spin on the text. I do not trust them and neither should others.

The Bible gives various warnings to those who would add to or subtract to the words of God. Perhaps it would be good to close with some of these scriptures.

Deuteronomy 4:2 Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the Lord your God which I command you.

Proverbs 30:6 Add thou not unto His words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar.

Revelation 22:18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: 19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

Comments
Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under ANNOUNCE, BlogPosts

New Podcast Uploaded: JFK-2 Solved By God


New Podcast Uploaded: JFK-2 Solved By God

Name: JFK-2 Solved By God
Description: Second podcast in this series begins with addressing the first hand Medical testimony and evidence which shows three different entry wounds, from three different positions, meaning three different rifles and three different shooters fired virtually simultaneously at President Kennedy’s head area.

PLAY ONLINE: http://www.cyberears.com/index.php/Browse/playaudio/24832

SUBSCRIBE RSS FEED: http://www.cyberears.com/podcasts/podcast_5772.xml

PLAY))) http://www.cyberears.com/cybrss/24832.mp3

(((Opens in your default MP3 player as Windows Media Player etc.

ChristianEministry.Com Podcasts 
By: eMinister,eChurchOfPhiladelphia.Org
HOME: http://www.cyberears.com/index.php/Show/audio/5772

Comments Off on New Podcast Uploaded: JFK-2 Solved By God

Filed under ANNOUNCE, BlogPosts

New Podcast: ChristianFreeSpeech-DuckDynasty-Controversies


New Podcast: ChristianFreeSpeech-DuckDynasty-Controversies

Hello all, our new podcast titled, ChristianFreeSpeech-DuckDynasty-Controversies, has been uploaded for play.

PODCAST HOME: ChristianEministry.Com Podcasts http://www.cyberears.com/index.php/Show/audio/5772 eMinister,eChurchOfPhiladelphia.Org

NEW PODCAST:
Name: ChristianFreeSpeech-DuckDynasty-Controversies
Description: ChristianEministry.Com Podcast ”Christian Free Speech – Duck Dynasty Controversies” covers the US Constitution and Christian Rights in America and rights of Evangelism, Free Speech and Assembly and Exercise thereof and the wisdom therein and the falsehoods of others. Terrorists against these are explained.

PLAY ONLINE:))) http://www.cyberears.com/index.php/Browse/playaudio/23932

OR SUBSCRIBE TO OUR RSS PODCAST FEED:
ChristianEministry.Com Podcasts http://www.cyberears.com/index.php/Show/audio/5772

Podcast RSS http://www.cyberears.com/podcasts/podcast_5772.xml
Podcasts and Music by eMinister of eChurchOfPhiladelphia.Org, Authorized King James Holy Bible only, the English language dedicated translation commonly accepted in the Faith as the Word of God. Webmaster ChristianEministry.Com.

PLAY))) Click link to automatically open in your MP3 Player (Windows Media Player etc)
http://www.cyberears.com/cybrss/23932.mp3

Comments Off on New Podcast: ChristianFreeSpeech-DuckDynasty-Controversies

Filed under ANNOUNCE, BlogPosts

The End – Satan in Hell, and the Widow


Isaiah 1:23 23 Thy princes are rebellious, and companions of thieves: every one loveth gifts, and followeth after rewards: they judge not the fatherless, neither doth the cause of the widow come unto them.

Isaiah 14
1 For the Lord will have mercy on Jacob, and will yet choose Israel, and set them in their own land: and the strangers shall be joined with them, and they shall cleave to the house of Jacob.
2 And the people shall take them, and bring them to their place: and the house of Israel shall possess them in the land of the Lord for servants and handmaids: and they shall take them captives, whose captives they were; and they shall rule over their oppressors. 3 And it shall come to pass in the day that the Lord shall give thee rest from thy sorrow, and from thy fear, and from the hard bondage wherein thou wast made to serve, 
4 That thou shalt take up this proverb against the king of Babylon, and say, How hath the oppressor ceased! the golden city ceased!
5 The Lord hath broken the staff of the wicked, and the sceptre of the rulers.
6 He who smote the people in wrath with a continual stroke, he that ruled the nations in anger, is persecuted, and none hindereth. 
7 The whole earth is at rest, and is quiet: they break forth into singing.
8 Yea, the fir trees rejoice at thee, and the cedars of Lebanon, saying, Since thou art laid down, no feller is come up against us.
9 Hell from beneath is moved for thee to meet thee at thy coming: it stirreth up the dead for thee, even all the chief ones of the earth; it hath raised up from their thrones all the kings of the nations. 
10 All they shall speak and say unto thee, Art thou also become weak as we? art thou become like unto us? 
11 Thy pomp is brought down to the grave, and the noise of thy viols: the worm is spread under thee, and the worms cover thee.
12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! 
13 For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: 
14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. 
15 Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit. 
16 They that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee, and consider thee, saying, Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms; 
17 That made the world as a wilderness, and destroyed the cities thereof; that opened not the house of his prisoners? 
18 All the kings of the nations, even all of them, lie in glory, every one in his own house. 
19 But thou art cast out of thy grave like an abominable branch, and as the raiment of those that are slain, thrust through with a sword, that go down to the stones of the pit; as a carcase trodden under feet. 
20 Thou shalt not be joined with them in burial, because thou hast destroyed thy land, and slain thy people: the seed of evildoers shall never be renowned. 
21 Prepare slaughter for his children for the iniquity of their fathers; that they do not rise, nor possess the land, nor fill the face of the world with cities. 
22 For I will rise up against them, saith the Lord of hosts, and cut off from Babylon the name, and remnant, and son, and nephew, saith the Lord. 
23 I will also make it a possession for the bittern, and pools of water: and I will sweep it with the besom of destruction, saith the Lord of hosts. 
24 The Lord of hosts hath sworn, saying, Surely as I have thought, so shall it come to pass; and as I have purposed, so shall it stand: 
25 That I will break the Assyrian in my land, and upon my mountains tread him under foot: then shall his yoke depart from off them, and his burden depart from off their shoulders. 
26 This is the purpose that is purposed upon the whole earth: and this is the hand that is stretched out upon all the nations. 
27 For the Lord of hosts hath purposed, and who shall disannul it? and his hand is stretched out, and who shall turn it back? 
28 In the year that king Ahaz died was this burden. 
29 Rejoice not thou, whole Palestina, because the rod of him that smote thee is broken: for out of the serpent’s root shall come forth a cockatrice, and his fruit shall be a fiery flying serpent. 
30 And the firstborn of the poor shall feed, and the needy shall lie down in safety: and I will kill thy root with famine, and he shall slay thy remnant. 
31 Howl, O gate; cry, O city; thou, whole Palestina, art dissolved: for there shall come from the north a smoke, and none shall be alone in his appointed times. 
32 What shall one then answer the messengers of the nation? That the Lord hath founded Zion, and the poor of his people shall trust in it.

Comments Off on The End – Satan in Hell, and the Widow

Filed under BlogPosts

ADDENDUM: Who Was Innocent – T.Martin, G. Zimmerman


ADDENDUM: Who Was Innocent – T.Martin, G. Zimmerman
 
PLEASE READ THE FIRST BLOG POST IMMEDIATELY BEFORE THIS ONE (BELOW THIS) AND THEN RETURN HERE FOR THIS FOLLOW UP –
READ: http://christianeministry.com/2013/07/17/who-was-innocent-trayvon-martin-george-zimmerman/  
 
ADDED NOTES…. I am thinking back to perhaps the greatest murder case in history – the President JFK assassination. There, prominent and now historic Attorney Mark Lane accepted hire from Lee Harvey Oswald’s mother for Lee H. Oswald. Now, he was and is a prominent Attorney and well versed and talented and so there HAD TO BE the legal basis to do this or he OBVIOUSLY would not have rendered legal services – to defend or give defense of a dead suspect in a case happening as charged, and being charged, not reaching trial or even arraignment on charges.
 
And so here we have Judgment in Florida that George Zimmerman is innocent and Trayvon Martin is then charged and judged as in the act of Attempted Homicide. It was incredible that this was not addressed with all the original rush of support to the Martin Family. Perhaps it has been, and perhaps there was needed first a judgment rendered to then take action. In effect, the trial occurred without Legal Representation for Trayvon Martin. OBVIOUSLY prosecution in the case did not and could not act as Assistance of Counsel for Trayvon Martin. They represented the Law and District as bringing charges against George Zimmerman. Nevertheless, President Obama has just recently now said there should be or will be a review into this event and or the Florida Laws concerning it. It may well be the case was NOT tried appropriately, and seems to be so by a large majority of Americans.

So see and understand that T. Martin was accused and convicted of Attempted Homicide as it is the only reason G. Zimmerman was found “Not Guilty” or he would be guilty of Murder by degree. The only way he could be “innocent” using deadly force is if he was defending his life against deadly force. And so the Verdict convicts T. Martin of Attempted Homicide – murder in degree – and declares Trayvon Martin as Guilty in the act of committing a Capital Offense (criminal charge which is punishable by the death penalty) as Judgment declared G. Zimmerman Not Guilty in Self Defense via Homicide making lawful “justifiable homicide” as a death penalty committed without due process of trial ….. which is an obscure allowance as only the President of the U.S. has power of response as engaging war without Congressional Declaration in cases of Imminent Danger (Invasion) to the Nation and similarly the State Executives for defense of State Invasion. Obviously war declared or made against the United States is Treason and capital offense with deadly force against same in National scale  where necessary.    

[AND THERE IS NO LEGALITY FOR ANY STATE TO DISMISS THE DEATH PENALTY AS THE US CONSTITUTION DECLARES THE RIGHT TO PUNISH CAPITAL OFFENSES AND ALL STATES ARE BOUND TO A REPUBLICAN FORM OF STATE GOVERNEMNET OF THE US CONSTITUTION ONLY – NOT CONTRARY TO OR DISMISSING THE US CONSTITUTION IN ANY POINT. THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AND NO STATE UNDER IT MAY PASS ANY BILL OF ATTAINDER WHICH MEANS STRIPPING ANYONE OF THE RIGHTS AND LAWS OF THE US CONSTITUTION. THEREFORE ANY STATE DISMISSING THE DEATH PENALTY IS GUILTY OF ISSUING AN UNLAWFUL BILL OF ATTAINDER IN THE MEANING OF GENERALLY STRIPPING RIGHTS OF THE STATE OF THE RIGHT OF PUNISHMENT FOR CAPITAL OFFENSE. MANY PUBLIC INTERPRETATIONS LACK VERITY AS THEY OPPOSE THEMSELVES SAYING AMERICA CAN NOT CONVICT FOR TREASON WHEN DESCRIBING LIFE OF ATTAINTED AND ARE RAMPANT AND PERHAPS RATHER THAN IGNORANCE – INTENTIONAL DISINFORMATION/

 Article Three, Section 3 “….The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.”

/YOU SEE THE US CONSTITUTION HAS THE POWER TO CONVICT VIA ATTAINDER OF TREASON. HOWEVER, IT DECLARES NO ONE ACCUSED MAY BE FORCED A SPIRITUAL CHANGE (CORRUPTION OF BLOOD OR TO SAY DEATH OF EXISTING SPIRIT) OR FORFEITURE OF LIFE (PUT TO DEATH) BUT ONLY AND ONLY AFTER CONVICTED BY DUE PROCESS OF LAW AT PUBLIC TRIAL (ATTAINTED – JUDGED, CONVICTED IN COURT – LIFE OF THE ATTAINTED/CONVICTED LEGALLY). LOOK AGAIN AS IT READS – CORRUPTION OR FORFEITURE OF BLOOD. PUT TO DEATH CAN NOT MEAN BOTH CORRUPTION AND FORFEITURE AS IT SAYS “OR” , THEY ARE WRITTEN INTO LAW AS TWO DIFFERENT ACTS. ONE IS SPIRITUAL AND THE OTHER PHYSICAL OR SIMILAR – TEMPORAL AND CORPORAL. BLOOD FROM THE CHRISTIANITY BIBLE MEANS SPIRIT OF LIFE AND COMMANDED NOT TO EAT THE BLOOD MEANING THE OBEDIENT SHALL NOT EAT/INDULGE IN THE DISBODIENT LAW BREAKING SPIRIT OF ANTICHRIST – THE CORRUPTED BLOOD/SPIRIT – COMMANDED TO POUR IT OUT ON THE GROUND OR TO SAY TREAT IT AS FORBIDDEN FORNICATION OF SPIRIT AND DISMISS IT COMPLETELY, AS COMMANDED IN THE DAY IF THOU SHALL EAT FROM THAT TREE (SATAN) THOU SHALL DIE (SPIRITUALLY, AND ALSO AS PUNISHMENT OBTAINED THE CURSE OF PHYSICAL DEATH TO DIE ONCE FOR SIN IS THE CURSE WHICH PHSICAL DEATH DID NOT EXIST PREVIOUSLY. ADAM AND EVE WERE IMMORTAL UNTIL THEY COMMITTED SPIRITUAL FORNICATION WITH THE DEVIL IN THE GARDEN OF EDEN.)

NOW CORRUPTION OF BLOOD WAS SUSPECTED AGAINST SIRHAN SIRHAN WITH THE HYPNOSIS PERFORMED AFTER HIS ARREST FOR THE ASSASSINATION OF US SENATOR PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE ROBERT F. KENNEDY IN SUSPECTING THEY ATTEMPTED TO CORRUPT HIS SPIRIT INTO SAYING HE ALONE SHOT RFK. ]

….and see here now in the Law what was denied T. Martin as convicted by Verdict as guilty of Attempted Homicide, Murder by degree….. 
 
The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution:
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Public+trial  
 
In this type case as a self defense homicide and this case particularly, it is apparently natural that a COMPLETE investigative inquest into the two individuals (Martin, Zimmerman) and ALL EVIDENCE is NECESSARY to determine how the death occurred – as being NECESSARY – as the ONLY testimony is one person’s word against the other as a statement as to what happened, the other silenced as perished. There was no Assistance of Counsel for Trayvon Martin. There was no cross examination of statement and evidences on Trayvon Martin’s behalf. The right of compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor was denied. And Trayvon Martin was convicted of Attempted Homicide never receiving a lawful Trial or Legal Representation for that. Was there even a phsychiatric examination performed of George Zimmerman ?
 
PERHAPS ATTY. MARK LANE WILL RETIRE WITH THIS CASE. HE SPOKE AND CONDUCTED AS THE FEARLESS LION OF NEW YORK IN THE JFK CASE. Don’t kid yourself, this may be the rave of this decade ending in so much new Legislation, even, totally concerning all laws and Proceedings for self defense Trials in America – and necessary. It will probably go as recent tradition that the opposition to guns as legal for self defense and the public bearing them etc will come from all the gun supporters and associations – perhaps ignorantly at first. They most  likely in the end will see eye to eye on most if not all of proposed Legislation for new Laws that may indeed be coming, even imminent. This is all may be a new eye opener and complete wake up call to this event of self defense in America and the way it is and has been handled in American Law.
 
The current Law seems completely deficient as rendering any Judgment in the case of self defense whereby one is alive as survivor and the other dead with only the survivor’s word as statement plea testimony that the other was in the act of committing Attempted Homicide etc. George Zimmerman and all these like cases of history and that shall occur should NOT have the right to not Testify in Open Court under Cross Examination citing the Fifth Amendment as, “No person…shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself…” . Having George Zimmerman TAKE THE STAND would not be the suspension of the Fifth Amendment but the employment of it in this and like cases…..
 
FIFTH AMMENDMENT: 
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
 
George Zimmerman’s “police statement” WAS NOT SWORN/UNDER OATH/Affirmation TESTIMONY IN PUBLIC TRIAL. Making the similar or same sworn/under oath/affirmation testimony in Public Trial is NOT compelled testimony against self. It is TESTIMONY FOR SELF – NOT AGAINST SELF. Since when is a Police Statement SWORN/UNDER OATH/Affirmation TESTIMONY IN PUBLIC TRIAL? This is a complete EPIPHANY here – A sudden manifestation of the essence or meaning of something, a comprehension or perception of reality by means of a sudden intuitive realization http://www.thefreedictionary.com/epiphany  
 
When anyone is pleading Not Gulity in any case in America they should legally be required to make their full statement as to why and how they are saying they are not guilty – NOT TO SIT THERE SILENT CITING THE FIFTH AMMENDMENT AS JUSTICE. They should be required to make a full statement and testimony sworn/under oath/affirmation saying HOW THEY ARE INNOCENT AS PLEA. The Fifth Amendment provided for the Law, Judges, Court and Officers to have their charges and case made and presented – NOT having the defendant do their work for them in court as being forced to testify against themselves – BUT that they have been elected and sworn into duty and appointed and at the Taxpayer’s expense, a good salary for a good job, not even mentioning the very integrity and honor expected demanded and earned. A FULL SWORN TESTIMONY AND STATEMENT BY THE DEFENDANT STATING IN FULL HOW AND WHY THEY ARE PLEADING GUILTY IS NOT COMPELLED TESTIMONY AGAINST ONE’S SELF – IT IS VOLUNTARY STATEMENT AND TESTIMONY FOR THEIR SELF! Of course as such, ALL Immunities and Privileges prevail preserving ALL right of the Fifth Amendment in all cases obviously.
 
BOTTOM LINE – THE ACT OF LETHAL DEADLY FORCE SELF DEFENSE HOMICIDE BY GEORGE ZIMMERMAN AND ALL LIKE CASES DECLARE THIS ACT AS A CAPITAL CRIME OFFENSE….. AND THE ENTIRE FIFTH AMMENDMENT APPLIES. A CAPITAL CRIME IS A CRIME PUNISHABLE BY DEATH. KILLING SOMEONE BY SELF DEFENSE IS THEREFORE CONDEMNING THAT PERSON AS A CAPITAL OFFENSE WITHOUT APPROPRIATE DUE PROCESS AND REGULATION BY CONGRESS AS THE BEARING OF ARMS TO DO SO. IT IS AGAINST THE LAW ALREADY TO DO THIS TO A TREASONER WITHOUT TWO OR MORE WITNESSES….. (and remember from my blogpost http://christianeministry.com/2012/12/18/sandy-hook-gun-control-act-proposal/  of how  it was proposed to place gangs under the RICO ACT http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeer_Influenced_and_Corrupt_Organizations_Act  which places them as under FEDERAL JURISDICTION and being armed illegally places them under the law of Treason as INSURRECTION) …..
 
Article Three Section 3 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Three_of_the_United_States_Constitution
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
 
The Instruments of the Law include Abstentia and Posthumous Award as relative for Foundation in a legal manner of opening the (JFK and now Trayvon Martin) to Public Trial, and particularly here, for those perished, silenced, defenseless and RE-TRIAL seems warranted.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_absentia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posthumous  
 
I AM NOT SAYING AMERICA SHOULD GIVE UP THE RIGHT TO SELF DEFENSE. I AM SAYING IN THE PUBLIC TRIAL OF THE ACT THAT THERE SHOULD NOT BE A JUDGMENT OF INNOCENT – BUT THAT A HOMICIDE HAS OCCURRED AND THERE BEING NO STATUE OF LIMITATIONS THAT THE CASE SHOULD REMAIN OPEN AND THAT ONLY NO EVIDENCE HAS CONVICTED ANYONE OF MURDER AND HOMICIDE IN DEGREE. THE PERSON COMMITTING THE ACT SHOULD BE CHARGED AND IS GUILTY OF THE HOMICIDE (KILLING SOMEONE) BUT THAT THE ACT HAS NOT BEEN DETERMINED OR PROVEN AS MURDER IN DEGREE AND THEREFORE REMAINS AN OPEN CASE UNTIL THAT COULD BE PROVEN. THE STATEMENT AND PLEA OF NOT GUILTY IS NOT SUFFICIENT CAUSE OF INNOCENCE THOUGH EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY HAS NOT BEEN PRODUCED. AS IS – PLACES THE COURT IN ENTRAPMENT OF THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY, COMPELLING AND FORCING THE COURT TO SURRENDER ALL DUE PROCESS OF LAW CLOSING THE CASE AGAINST DUE PROCESS OF PUBLIC TRIAL GUARANTEED TO ALL OF AMERICA. SIMPLY SAYING THEY COULD NOT FIND EVIDENCE TO CONVICT OF MURDER IN DEGREE DOES NOT MAKE THE DEFENDANT INNOCENT IN THE EYES OF THE LAW OR CITIZENS AND YET AGREED THE PERSON IS NOT HELD FOR IT AS GUILTY OBVIOUSLY. THE CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED – JUST THE DEFENDANT – AS NOT HAVING EVIDENCE OR WITNESSES TO HOLD THEM FURTHER – NOT, NOT RENDERING A VERDICT OF NOT GUILTY UNDER ANY STRETCH OF THE IMAGINATION AS THERE IS NO PROOF OF THAT, ONLY LACK OF PROOF TO THE CONTRARY.
 
I believe these are some of the lines of thought with Atty. Mark Lane and the Lee Harvey Oswald case in similar vein.

UPDATED……

The In Absentia is as an instrument in law and US Law that mostly refers to defendants and trials and the defendent’s rights to be at the trial. There are events that have rendered acceptable exceptions. The rest is dealing with a deceased person who can not appear of the case. In Absentia demanding no trial without the defendent present the basis untold or explained is that based on the US Consitutional rights of Americans, who being a defendent charged with some crime, have the right to Assistance of Counsel (lawyer). This means anyone charged is responsible for their own defense conduct of the trial and that what they lack in legal knowledge is supported by their lawyer, so that all things are equal for both sides as being equally represented.
The MAIN operative word is “Assistance” of Counsel. Not their lawyer conducting their defense for them. The defendent is responsible for their defense and may at anytime have the lawyer speak for them in legal terms neccessary and, without saying otherwise, are agreeing that their lawyer speaking is speaking for them as they would speak if they had the neccessary legal knowledge of how to so speak. If at anytime a defendent disagrees that their defense lawyer is not speaking correctly as they would, they are repsonsible for that, whatever is necessary to correct things. The Assistance of Counsel may ONLY speak as the defendant has allowed and is so agreeing to all things said. Naturally a defendent may not, being found guilty, say they want another trial with another lawyer because they did not like the outcome and want another lawyer for a different one – but not dismissing that if their is an appeal against the judgment lawful, they are guaranteed the right in the US appelate jurisdiction, right to lawfully appeal a decision.
ACCORDING to the accepted EXCEPTIONS of In Absentia, and are rendered decisions of record, a defendent charged and is deceased does not preclude the defendent has no right to Assistance of Counsel defending their person, effects, and life etc in trial – much as a defendent who may be medically or physically incompetent or may have one as in the area of Legal Guardian for them and so forth as Juvenile etc – the exceptions allow for the deceased to be represented in trial as by their “guardian” as next of kin (family) etc so choosing their Assistance of Counsel for the deceased on their behalf legally such as even in cases of some court ward etc even necessary by the Court. And so in juvenile cases the under aged receive any Assistance of Counsel via their parents or Legal Guardians etc or Court appointed where necessary and lawful.
It is OBVIOUSLY conflict of interest or absenst therein that the District bringing charges of murder in degree is as well the designated legal Assistance of Counsel for the Affiant. In short, the Affiant (one pressing charges) may bring Assistance of Counsel to the District to begin the arrest proceedings to insure they are reporting the crime(s) appropriately by the law, seeking the proper legal proceedings appropriate and having sight of the proceedings, everything as of record legally as sworn statements made by them etc.
And so, again, I believe these are some possible thoughts of, or arguments even, made by prominent Attorney Mark Lane hired by the Oswald Family and pursued all the way to the LBJ Presidential Commission as the Warren Commision or Report. Here the similar is the unfortunate unprotected Trayvon Martin.
We can look to some fantasy example as some Life Insurance company hires to kill some client who may be ready to die and thus under Policy death will afford them the monies due at death, but has some clause that they are not responsible for death by murder only accident, and thus the deceased must be represented by the Assistance of Counsel to pursue the claim as not some incidental random homocide but a murder to avoid due compensation. That is not the best example and complex to the event here as the death of T. Martin. Trayvon Martin being convicted by Verdict in the case as guilty of Capital Offense was denied Assistance of Counsel to clear his name, person, effects, and record etc. – to legally defend him against such charges as the District was bringing charges against defendent G. Zimmerman and NOT the Legal Guardian and NOT Counsel representing T. Martin, as his Parents were present. The District could NOT speak on behalf of Trayvon Martin being a juvenile (not orphan) – with his lawful Parents as living, alive, and legal parents and guardians of the juvenile deceased being his lawful representation before and after.
I AM CERTAIN A RE-TRIAL IS IN ORDER! The real can of worms here is the epiphany realizing in all States who have dismissed the Death Penalty and unlawfully as the US Constitution provides for Capital Offenses as Law of the Land – that in those States then they have unlawfully stripped the rights of Self Defense – the using of deadly force to stop deadly force and is then defined as the deceased was committing a Capital Offense (crime worthy of death penalty) and therefore in effect has made it ILLEGAL for their State citizens and residents to defend their lives with deadly force against deadly force. THIS is what is meant by (paraphrased) “Congress may pass no Bill of Attainder…” meaning Congress can NOT pass any bill into Law that removes existing rights of American Citizens or the Goverment itself. The US Constitution as Law of the Land as well makes and is Law that EVERY State shall have a State Government modeled after (republican form of governemt) the US Constitution ONLY. The “republican” form of government means an inferior or lesser servant of serving the greater – republican – and of course means ALL states are inferior to Federal Law. States may NOT prevail over Federal Law. However, Federal Law PREVAILS over ALL States WITHOUT EXCEPTION. This is the meaning of “Law of the Land” – Federal authority of ALL the United States and EVERYTHING THEREIN. No State may act independently of the Law and pass their own form of Bill Of Attainder that dismisses the Law of the Land – the United States Consitution IN ANY POINT being a State with a required Republican Form of Government.

CAN OF WORMS 2…. What needs be preserved is that murder is unlawful and is a punishable crime in America. To say only the guardians or family etc of the deceased may bring charges and not the Court and Officers (Police, Militia, etc) in effect is legalizing murder in some degree were charges are not pressed. THIS is obviously not any result of legislation proposed or acceptable as virtually the entire world views murder as unlawful and is a punishable crime expressly no matter who commits it.
As the President suggested Review, I think here there may possibly be new Legislation necessary to preserve equality and balance and justice as to ammend Trial to indeed include that seperate right of the Assistance of Counsel of Affiants to have right to the exact charges and accusations made by the District and so is preliminary to Proceedings as being in agreement first. This same as well applying to Defendants appropriately and equally as in the unique cases here – as Self Defense via deadly force against deadly force attack where there are no witnesses other than the living survivor of the event.

The troubling result has been with the Verdict in the T. Martin – G. Zimmerman case that the Nation is left with T. Martin was convicted without due process of murder in degree by reason of the innocent Verdict of G. Zimmerman using deadly force Self Defense against whom he accused (T. Martin) without witnesses of attempted murder, to say was found as guilty of deadly force attack against G. Zimmerman with no contesting of those charges and judgment by the accused Trayvon Martin represented by right of Assistance of Counsel of the act of murder in degree – apparently the Court declaring as not a premeditated act of murder (1st Degree) even with dismissing certain evidences as inadmissable and was not in effect legally tried as such. To say, the Court pronounced charges of assault and murder against Trayvon Martin without a jury trial of said accusation and charges by reason of rendering Verdict. The Court tried G. Zimmerman only, by action, and declared him not guilty by reason of self defense by his statement and word only and medical evidence presented – basically as centerpiece only in the trial – of which medical evidence did not prove guilt of the accused T. Martin but rather was presented as the innocense of G. Zimmerman…. physical injuries that were NEVER proven as occurring at the time and place of his use of deadly force (homicide) against T. Martin. The medical injury evidence was apparently only tried for the verification that those injuries sustained may have been suffered in a deadly force attack. That was it. To suggest that T. Martin had and or was able to perform them leads to supposistion and leading the jury to a conclusion unlawfully. How many Americans could similarly fit that description as being able to perform those type injuries – were they accusing all of America that day? (Animal House, “…We’re not going to sit here and listen to you bad mouth the United States of America…”)
Disturbingly, these cases seem to legalize murder and should and can not continue in that manner. Reminds me of an old 1960s era Rock N Roll band named Vanilla Fudge if you get the dual meaning. That’s what they said about Lee Harvey Oswald ….. Case closed. Hmmm….

 

HOW MAY THE US CONGRESS TAKE THIS CASE IN REVIEW AND RETRIAL?
Article IV, Section 1:
“Full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state. And the Congress may by general laws prescribe the manner in which such acts, records, and proceedings shall be proved, and the effect thereof.”
…This is too many times misconstrued and even intentionally as misinformation and interpretation – Full Faith and Credit shall be given…. is what and by whom? Full Faith and Credit is given by the Federal Government to each State as being trusted in as the honor system, or blind faith, by promise, etc they are and will remain in compliance of putting forth into Law a republican form of government of the United States Constitution ONLY dismissing nothing, not denying and not disparaging any rights of American Citizens as citizens and residents of that State that are guaranteed all Rights as United States Citizens.
It includes State to State by State examination of public acts, records, and judicial proceedings and to compare as to the same equal justice being necessary. Judicial Proceedings can prove a more true judgment arrived in one State to Judicial Proceedings in another to be compared to – of course not infringing upon the profession and talent and income of Attorneys etc, to say how a judgment was reached lawfully. However ONLY Congress by laws may prescribe the manner in which such acts, records, and proceedings shall be proved, and the effect thereof. ONLY Congress has the right and overview and is Law of the Land as to how Judicial Proceedings are proved. ONLY Congress may render opinion and fact as to the EFFECT of any Judicial Proceeding in the States.
ALL THE ABOVE WRITTEN COMMENTS AND OPINIONS BY ME SHOW THE BOTTTOM LINE THAT THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS MAY TAKE FULL POCESSION OF THIS CASE TO EXAMINE AND PROVE THE CASE AS LAWFUL AND INCLUDING BY RENDERING THE EFFECT OF THIS CASE AS TO WHETHER THERE HAVE BEEN ANY FEDERAL LAWS VIOLATED OR STATE LAWS OR DISTRICT. THE US SUPREME COURT MUST REFLECT THIS – THE POWER OF THE US CONGRESS – IN ANY PROCESSION.
This then includes the Sixth Amendment (Amendment VI)…” In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law….”
…. This is to say then that “…which district shall have been previously ascertained by law…” shows the Federal Authority and to have oversite of Proof and to Prove the District (where this case was tried) is and was “previously ascertained by law” and is part of that FULL FAITH AND CREDIT GIVEN by the Federal Goverment (that blind faith, honor system, etc) that Florida is indeed in compliance with a state republican form of goverment of the US Constitution and this IS NOT the “double jeopardy” violation, to say the case can not be tried again or reviewed. The District in the State (county, town, etc) or State itself has NO power to stop the US Congress from this. The US Congress may show the effect of a flawed Judicial Proceeding in a State and prove any “mistrial” etc and declare it a void judgment and case be retried. Which is to say perhaps this is the route as opposed to “take it all the way to the US Supreme Court” – always assumed as the only way to get justice in cases via lawful appeal etc. The case retried then is NOT in violation of the Fifth Ammendment (“..nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb…”) .

PODCAST SHALL FOLLOW SHORTLY – AUDIO VERSION COMMENTED.

Comments Off on ADDENDUM: Who Was Innocent – T.Martin, G. Zimmerman

Filed under BlogPosts

Who Was Innocent – Trayvon Martin, George Zimmerman


Who Was Innocent – Trayvon Martin, George Zimmerman

Hello all…. I am writing this blog post for a couple of reasons. The first actually being because out the outpouring of complaint against the judgement of innocent for George Zimmerman in the Trayvon Martin / George Zimmerman case. Because I have a bottom line message for Mr. Zimmerman, the survivor. Because of the recent Gun Control debates again after the Sandy Hook School shootings/slayings. Because of Stand Your Ground Laws. Because of how the Free Press itself seemed to have duped the Public on this one in advance and leading to more elongated and even profitable ongoing news surrounding an anticipated near riot nationwide even in extreme of a not guilty verdict. Because at the trial and end of things, all the truth was coming out that was previously all blurred innuendo and half truths and bended truths and just misguidance altogether and mostly by the Free Press on this one.

The Free Press rushed this into an apparent racial slaying, pre-meditated even perhaps via innuendo. Some innocent child-man eating candy and sipping a soda getting slain via handgun for no reason whatsoever. There cute little “leaking” the words of Mr.George Zimmerman as using the other “N-” word and there you are. They seemed to all completely side with the “rush to judgement” – and looking back seems quite intentional on this one as soliciting and even aiding protest in advance of an innocent verdict for simply more news they get to do and more self aggrandizing fame and more advertising dollars to boot perhaps.

The truth coming out in the end, referring to the actual specifics of medical reports and who did what etc, made me suddenly wonder if Mr.George Zimmerman was actually a political target by some leftist conservative Republican clan attempting gains of the “Black Vote” in Florida by the apparent secondary decision of prosecuting Mr.George Zimmerman. Not far off, to allow to die in prison – leave George Z. rot in prison – for their advancement, as some and Tea Party jargonism seems promoting parricide http://www.thefreedictionary.com/parricide (parent killing) in some vein – as appealing to the Youth and Middle America vote to end Social Security and simply throw all their Grand Parents into the streets even if suffering life threatening illnesses – cut them off altogether and leave them to die in the streets – to save that miniscule few dollars weekly in the paycheck and for corporates to shovel out a few more bucks as increased profit to shareholders gaining love for money praise. Vote for us for those few extra bucks you can squeeze off to make your mortgage or rent or car payments etc.

We are all aware of the nutz crazy rave in America running back and forth between the two sides in cable/satellite News – namely Fox and NBC – as one too leftist (conservative) and one, perhaps too rightest (liberal). I grew up as a die-hard JFK Kennedy Democrat so you know and is why my surprise in this case is – hearing the truth finally that leaves me with a whole honest view as the juror would be, and the outcome of that true evidence a real mindblower as to the correct judgment as opposed to the crapola that was originally spreading as a pending avalanche in the Free Press. This was almost, almost, becoming on the magnitude of the O. J. Simpson Trial. It may still I hope not.

I have some things you may want to consider and because I see some wrong going on and in the eyes of the law which we need obey and particularly when they are right even if you do not like it for any reason. Some may walk away from this in disbelief of opinions here, some may learn something here or give to reflect again.

As growing up in the Viet Nam Era in America and ALL the protests the world has heard of, seen, or even participated in….. you can take it from a veteran voice that if you are speaking wrongly and demanding wrongly – speaking prematurely – just demanding what you want regardless of the law and facts, well you are not going to get anywhere and you are certainly not going to get what you want if it is contrary to the truth and facts and Law and legal judgment. A childish temper tantrum is most times punished or ignored to the intention of teaching the disobedience will not prevail over right and moral. This is some necessary food for thought I am seeing of the protestors in the news and their positions.

What is aghast is how the Free Press began by painting Trayvon Martin as a young innocent child even as pure as the driven snow, skipping down the Primrose Lane of lovely care free innocent life sipping a soda and munching candy. What was revealed in the trial beyond the shadow of a doubt was that was the furthest thing from the truth at those moments.

If you will, take some advice and read this from God’s Word and closing words….

BOOK OF JAMES (New Testament)
Chapter 2
1 My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons.
2 For if there come unto your assembly a man with a gold ring, in goodly apparel, and there come in also a poor man in vile raiment;
3 And ye have respect to him that weareth the gay clothing, and say unto him, Sit thou here in a good place; and say to the poor, Stand thou there, or sit here under my footstool:
4 Are ye not then partial in yourselves, and are become judges of evil thoughts?
5 Hearken, my beloved brethren, Hath not God chosen the poor of this world rich in faith, and heirs of the kingdom which he hath promised to them that love him?
6 But ye have despised the poor. Do not rich men oppress you, and draw you before the judgment seats?
7 Do not they blaspheme that worthy name by the which ye are called?
8 If ye fulfil the royal law according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself, ye do well:
9 But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors.
10 For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.
11 For he that said, Do not commit adultery, said also, Do not kill. Now if thou commit no adultery, yet if thou kill, thou art become a transgressor of the law.
12 So speak ye, and so do, as they that shall be judged by the law of liberty.
13 For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment.
14 What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save him?
15 If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food,
16 And one of you say unto them, Depart in peace, be ye warmed and filled; notwithstanding ye give them not those things which are needful to the body; what doth it profit?
17 Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.
18 Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works.
19 Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble.
20 But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?
21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar?
22 Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?
23 And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.
24 Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.
25 Likewise also was not Rahab the harlot justified by works, when she had received the messengers, and had sent them out another way?
26 For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.

Here is that verse I am referring to…..

4 Are ye not then partial in yourselves, and are become judges of evil thoughts?

….Becoming judges of evil thoughts is this “food for thought” to examine yourselves here. Are you putting aside facts for feelings? Are you choosing what you want and wished is your new law now you want? Are you deliberately and knowingly reading into the results for a different outcome in the case because it is what you think you believe about Mr. George Zimmerman? And who are you to know this – his inner thoughts or the flip side – Mr. Trayvon Martin’s inner thoughts that day?

Are you God now? Some gifted mind reader? You know what either was thinking at the moment? Rascist? Thief murderer? None of the words going on out here are ANYTHING but speculation and thoughts and wishes and guesses – NOTHING truthful proven beyond the shadow of a doubt in the judgment which did in this case.
It did show demeanor http://www.thefreedictionary.com/demeanor

READ….. ARE YOU GOD KNOWING ALL THOUGHTS OF ALL?

Jeremiah 17
9 The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it? 
10 I the Lord search the heart, I try the reins, even to give every man according to his ways, and according to the fruit of his doings.

Psalms 94:11 The Lord knoweth the thoughts of man….

I Chronicles 28:9 …for the Lord searcheth all hearts, and understandeth all the imaginations of the thoughts: if thou seek him, he will be found of thee; but if thou forsake him, he will cast thee off for ever.

Psalms 55
8 For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the Lord.
9 For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.

I Corinthians 3
18 Let no man deceive himself. If any man among you seemeth to be wise in this world, let him become a fool, that he may be wise.
19 For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness.
20 And again, The Lord knoweth the thoughts of the wise, that they are vain.
21 Therefore let no man glory in men. For all things are yours;

Psalms 7:9 Oh let the wickedness of the wicked come to an end; but establish the just: for the righteous God trieth the hearts and reins.

You can wrongly go the way of saying George Z. was just waiting for the chance to shoot a Black American. How would you know? Guessing is law now? I used to own a Bloodhound with AKC Pedigree Papers and these are sometimes called “coon dogs” meaning they do well against and hunting racoons. They have the heart of a lion and will not back down to anything, nor probably even a lion or bear actually. I would not doubt it. They are very brave. But that phrase, does it mean all drug users who are thieves for their habits? Did it mean racially as that other “n-word”? Well? Do you know George Z. ‘s inner thoughts now as God?

You can wrongly go the way of saying Trayvon M. was a thief and violent murderer just waiting for a chance of violence and/or murder against a Community Town Watch member or Captain or other law abiding citizen when the opportunity presented itself seemingly of not getting caught doing it, and here while patrolling for thieving with a perfect “short cut” alibi. So you are God now and know all this as fact? Can you even answer if Trayvon M. knew he was committing the crime of Criminal Trespass in walking through Private Property as it was not Public Throughway – the “short cut”?

WHAT WAS PROVEN BEYOND THE SHADOW OF A DOUBT LEGALLY/LAWFULLY – IS FACT…..

So the truth came out in the buckets each day of the trial with daily reports. The truth as facts that were facts beyond a reasonable doubt – beyond the shadow of a doubt are facts and constitute judgment.
The medical facts showed George Z. suffered deadly force injuries severe enough to, beyond a reasonable doubt, use deadly force for self protection.

The medical facts showed beyond a reasonable doubt that Trayvon M. had traces of illegal marijuana in his system/body – although being portayed as Snow White or Little Red Riding Hood or any like analogy as a young innocent child even as pure as the driven snow, skipping down the Primrose Lane of lovely care free innocent life sipping a soda and munching candy being so innocent without a carnal mind or thought at all. Oh please! we found out. Beyond reasonable doubt as fact, Trayvon M. applied deadly force against another human being that moment. Trayvon M. was breaking the law as criminally trespassing through private property. Trayvon M. was breaking the law as in pocession of illegal marijuana drug/substance.

The demeanor of Trayvon M. proven beyond reasonable doubt and is fact then was he would use deadly force in this moment. Whether it was a mistake of too much force as deadly and/or even due to inebreation can not be determined but that he reacted this way in this moment shows his demeanor in this case. What may be a second tradgedy here is his mother who apparently denied her son was ever involved in drugs or stealing or violence. What was proven beyond reasonable doubt and is fact was her son was of demeanor that he would use deadly force in such this occasion. Shocking then no doubt. It could still be argued he was victim of second hand marijuana smoke not knowing it was indeed illegal marijuana. It was not proven he was a chronic drug user. It was proven beyond reasonable doubt and is fact he was commensurately inebriated as was apparent by the small trace – as to whether residual from earlier moderate to heavy use in those commensurate hours wearing off as leaving the trace amount found in him and then at that level of inebration. Actual full clarity of that I am sure was available. One point could be an aggravated deadly force response  by Trayvon M. due to the effects of the marijuana effect wearing almost totally off leaving with a headache and craving harder substance and aggravated feeling as no longer euphoric and towards somewhat exhaustion, tiredness – does not want to be disturbed. Real world calls that “crashing”. With the trace amount it is possible he was crashing from an hour or hours earlier of getting high in other words.

I can sympathize with the mother of Trayvon M. as when I was young I got in trouble mainlining meth (shooting speed in veins with needle) and went to jail for stealing and an in-patient drug rehabilitation program for over a year were I actually ended up as Layman Assistant Residential Therapist. My mother almost to her dying day could just not accept that I was a “hype” – a junkie shooting dope with needles drug user – only not heroin but the opposite stuff, speed (Crystal Meth, Biker Meth, Monster, etc etc etc). I could never figure her denial to this day. I was fortunate of God and Country I was given a second chance to live a law abiding productive life and did. Again here you can say Trayvon M. was as an addict with at least marijuana and was stealing to support his habit and call in the IRS to prove he consumed more than he could pay for, and so stole for it or sold it for profit to pay for his own consumption of it. But it was not proven beyond reasonable doubt and is fact that he had a trace of the substance in his system at time of death that I heard in reports. It can and is proven beyond reasonable doubt and is fact he at least was under its influence once – that moment.

The demeanor of George Z. was proven beyond reasonable doubt and is fact he disdained thieves being in the Community Watch as inferred from his sentence “so and so ….never learn their lesson…” or what it was exactly said. Again a raccoon is as generally a nocturnal animal getting into everything and taking what it wants and will attack back. If this was said it can refer to a thief as any color. It was not proven beyond reasonable doubt and is fact he was of demeanor as racial at the moment of conflict. It was proven beyond reasonable doubt and is fact that all of George Z.’s statements made were not anything but stating self defense and was proven beyond reasonable doubt and is fact it was.

MY QUESTION / COMMENT TO GEORGE Z. …..

In the United States Constitution it is clearly the spirit of the wording that the People’s Right to Keep and Bear Arms is CLEARLY intended as National Defense. Not local Militia (Police, State Police etc). It might be construed drug usage and even thieves may be of an international threat or alien influence opposed to America. History will show drug addicts are victims of foreign influence, not perpetrators. Historically, thieves have never amounted to more than Hole In The Wall Jesse James or Al Capone and those after him. National threat?

And so I had just did a Podcast about Gun legislation and rights from the Sandy Hook massacre.
SandyHookGunControlActProposal http://www.cyberears.com/index.php/Browse/playaudio/17721

This incident has jumped back at the soul of this across the nation. It is my opinion in the podcast if you listen, that no citizen should have the right other than self protection in their own home as bottom line and you MUST listen to the whole cast to see how that is arrived at objectively. It covers this episode in America – and should Americans bear arms fighting all the drive by spraying with bullets attacks and murders – even innocent by-standers? Street sweepers in revenge assassination? The answer, we know already. Not without professional training as is the law for the United States Armed Forces and all Local Police etc etc etc. The citizenry would do more harm than good considering friendly fire casualties and property damage.

In the podcast you understand ALL arms are under Congressional Regulation first. It is NOT in the US Constitution Americans have the Right of Self Defense. This has been extension by inference of the law and grace of the American Government. The Right to Keep and Bear Arms is for NATIONAL DEFENSE and STATE DEFENSE against invasion.

George Z., were you defending America that day? Or were you under the grace of American and State Government to defend your own life? I didn’t look up the particulars of Engagement, with whom turned out to be Trayvon Martin, but I will assume if you were proper in any manner you identified yourself as member or captain of the Community Watch (which by the way was founded here in Philadelphia, my town, as “Town Watch”) – whatever the appropriate title – and that you asked the subject to remain still, as the Police have been dispatched per report and will be here momentarily to question the subject.

Town watch
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Town_watch
“The Town watch program is similar to that of the Neighborhood watch, the major difference is that the Town Watch tend to actively patrol in pseudo-uniforms, i.e. marked vests or jackets and caps, and is equipped with two way radios to directly contact the local police. The Town Watch serves as an auxiliary to the police which provides weapons (if any), equipment, and training. The town watch usually returns their gear at the end of their duty.”

And here will begin the great debate no doubt now that all these “Town Watch” groups throughout America should in NO WAY have the right to bear arms and self defense while in the service of same. These are NOT POLICE and should NOT be regarded as such either in name and respect and honor OR armament – having NO PROFESSIONAL TRAINING required BY LAW for their “superiors” the Local Police militia. I think people’s reaction as wann-a-bee cop may apply to all. BUT don’t leave yet, I am not done.

CONSIDER THIS GEORGE Z. ….. I got back up of my words….

The grace of the American Government is found in Community Town Watch areas as extra eyes and ears of the Law as SPOTTERS and not even trained in this criminologist area. About the only qualifications these are equal to is simply being a law abiding American Citizen and trusted – as an American Juror is. That’s it. Observers doing there best to judge and report right and wrong without being professionally trained as professionals of and for this part of Society. Confrontation in this can be deadly and less and is why it is NOT to be engaged other than by a Professional trained to do so LEGALLY. These should and are to be ONLY observers, reporting perceived crime by who and where and updates as to where they are if they move away right over 911 like any other untrained citizen does.

An even slightly more aggressive than that (observer) association as far as citizen arrest are…..

CONSIDER THE GUARDIAN ANGELS (FAMOUS UNARMED TOWN WATCH ASSOCIATION IN WORST CRIME AREA IN USA – ORIGINALLY NEW YORK)

Guardian Angels
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guardian_Angels
PHOTO MIAMI GUARDIAN ANGELS
Screenshot: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/ee/Miami_angels.jpg/800px-Miami_angels.jpg

THESE FOLLOW BEST THE GRACE INTENDED BY THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT AND PEOPLE. THE REST FOR THE REST HAVE BEEN DULY ELECTED AND SWORN IN AND ATTEND CONTINUALLY. THE REST PARTICULARLY IF ARMED SHOULD BE BANNED IMMEDIATELY LEAVING THE GUARDIAN ANGELS AS ROLE MODEL OR ANYTHING WEAKER.

and there is no constitutional authority for “citizen’s arrest” – as is false imprisonment and kidnap as violating citizen rights of free assembly. Citizens have the right to possess their persons effects and property and can defend their lives to the death against injury and murder, but they have no right to detain anyone as they are not Officers of the Law. ONLY these have been duly elected an sworn into duty and are legally endowed to suspend legally a suspect’s right to assembly via arrest for crime per probable cause. The US Constitution does not extend this to citizens. However it does extend National Defense to citizens in the Right To Keep and Bear Arms. Obviously the US Constitution does not extend to Citizens the right to detain enemies of the constitution whereby in defense of the nation if there are unarmed enemies – they can not force them anywhere in detention awaiting Armed Forces to pick them up. Treason under the US Constitution can ONLY be defined by citizens as …..

Article Three Section 3 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Three_of_the_United_States_Constitution
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

TWO OR MORE WITNESSES ARE NEEDED OF CITIZENS TO CONVICT A TREASONER OF THE WHICH THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO DEFEND AGAINST AS INVASION WITH RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS. CITIZENS DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO DETAIN OR SET UP COURT OR JAIL FOR INVADERS COMMITTING TREASON – TREASON BEING DEFINED BY THE US CONSTITUTION AS LEVYING WAR AGAINST THE UNITED STATES. ALL OTHERS ARE BROUGHT TO COURT WHERE CITIZEN WITNESSES MAY TESTIFY. CITIZENS HAVE NO COURTS POWERS ANYWHERE IN BETWEEN AND THEREFORE HAVE NO RIGHT TO CITIZENS ARREST. ONLY THE COURTS AND OFFICERS HAVE RIGHT BY PROBABLE CAUSE TO SUSPEND THE RIGHT OF ASSEMBLY WHICH IS DETAINMENT AND ARREST. CITIZENS HAVE RIGHTS TO THEIR PROPERTY PERSONS AND EFFECTS AND TO DEFEND AGAINST DEADLY FORCE AND DAMAGE TO LIFE AND LIMB BUT NOT TO SUSPEND THE RIGHT OF ASSEMBLY WHICH IS DETAINMENT AND ARREST.

I guess this will all end up in protests and hearings by the Supreme Court and action by Congress. So George Z. – still think you had any right to touch Trayvon M. in the name of the law? Let alone shoot someone engaging them, not by any Town Watch law, but by common Stand Your Ground law? They let you go. It is apparently the law in Florida for the moment. Apparently you have been found innocent by reason of self defense. In my opinion you have to prove to yourself, God, and Nation you did not solicit Aggravated Homicide secretly with intent of deadly defense. Who jumped who? Only you, God, Jesus Christ, the Holy Spirit, and just maybe maybe the Devil know the truth. Maybe soon you will be able to or want to share that with the nation somewhere down the line. Ease the tensions. End the doubts. If you are not inclined, I suggest getting baptized into Christianity and become reborn. It will for sure make you honest and wise! Knowing what to say and when. God teaches us in the Holy Bible in the New Testament, the Gospel of Jesus Christ, to confess sins among each other. This doesn’t mean list them one by one – no not at all. It means more as general faults that sin or handfuls of instances of sin or transgression of God’s laws occurred from – faults, ignorance of laws or just willing sinful behavior. It guides us to make amends as we can wisely. Not re-opening old wounds of hurt, but simply try and restore in a smart mature way perhaps that which was stolen or taken or destroyed and so on.

AND FINALLY, HERE IS OUR DIRECTION FROM GOD’S WORD…..  SPEAK RIGHT – DO RIGHT

Proverbs Chapter 16
1 The preparations of the heart in man, and the answer of the tongue, is from the Lord.
2 All the ways of a man are clean in his own eyes; but the Lord weigheth the spirits.
3 Commit thy works unto the Lord, and thy thoughts shall be established.
4 The Lord hath made all things for himself: yea, even the wicked for the day of evil.
5 Every one that is proud in heart is an abomination to the Lord: though hand join in hand, he shall not be unpunished.
6 By mercy and truth iniquity is purged: and by the fear of the Lord men depart from evil.
7 When a man’s ways please the Lord, he maketh even his enemies to be at peace with him.
8 Better is a little with righteousness than great revenues without right.
9 A man’s heart deviseth his way: but the Lord directeth his steps.
10 A divine sentence is in the lips of the king: his mouth transgresseth not in judgment.

AND KING DAVID WROTE (father of Solomon)….

Chapter 26
A Psalm of David.
1 Judge me, O Lord; for I have walked in mine integrity: I have trusted also in the Lord; therefore I shall not slide.
2 Examine me, O Lord, and prove me; try my reins and my heart.
3 For thy lovingkindness is before mine eyes: and I have walked in thy truth.
4 I have not sat with vain persons, neither will I go in with dissemblers.
5 I have hated the congregation of evil doers; and will not sit with the wicked.
6 I will wash mine hands in innocency: so will I compass thine altar, O Lord:
7 That I may publish with the voice of thanksgiving, and tell of all thy wondrous works.
8 Lord, I have loved the habitation of thy house, and the place where thine honour dwelleth.
9 Gather not my soul with sinners, nor my life with bloody men:
10 In whose hands is mischief, and their right hand is full of bribes.
11 But as for me, I will walk in mine integrity: redeem me, and be merciful unto me.
12 My foot standeth in an even place: in the congregations will I bless the Lord.

—-

Addendum….. President Barak Obama has commented “…We are a Nation of Laws…” . (referring to the Jury Verdict)

Among the Scales of Justice there is Truth and Fact.  We have the two weights, the two sides of the scales resulting in the Judgment – Innocent. On the one side, Martin is found as in the act of homicide, responding to the presence of Zimmerman with lethal deadly force. On the other side of the scales we have Zimmerman found as returning deadly force, shooting in self defense resulting in death. In the Scales of Justice, Judgment by Truth and Fact, we as the Jurors see that unless Zimmerman had acted in self defense he would have been victim of homicide – dead. These are the reported Facts and Truth rendering Judgment in the Scales of Justice in American Law.

There remains a strong feeling or suspicion against that. If we view from any type Criminologist, or Phsychologist, or Phsychiatrist – any type qualified opinion in the area of crime and behavior, it seems too much of a jump in crime for a 17 year old juvenile with possibly apparently a light juvenile record even, to go from occasional marajuana use and possible one or couple thefts with no apparent gang membership activity etc – seems too much of a jump from a normal 17 year old juvenile who got off-track somewhat with marajuana experimenting to then the next crime being jumping all the way up the scale to complete physical violent attack and violent enough as becoming then lethal deadly force – killing another person. These are at opposite poles, opposite ends of crime and behavior. In this case, the next more serious crime for this juvenile scenario might be along the lines of burgarly in some fashion or degree as breaking into homes or cars or stores with no one in them to steal mechandise, property of cash value to then perhaps purchase drugs and NOT armed robbery. But the jump here seems from a “weekend warrior” type behavior of sneaking several marajuana cigarettes (joints) on the weekend with friends and maybe one or two in the middle of the week even – almost as a “casual recreational user” – jumping all the way to murderer in the assumption of not wanting to get caught “holding” (having illicit drugs on person). That behavior is generally as by any major illegal drug dealer in great volume resulting in great imprisonment time behind bars if caught – NOT some misdemeanor small amount punishable by fine. It is too much of a jump and too much of an overkill.

BUT if we take away that weight from the Scales of Justice – take away Martin was in the act of committing homicide – we are left with the one side of innocent G. Zimmerman. So to even the Scales of Justice we must take away this weight. If Martin was not in the act of committing Homicide, being stopped in the act of killing Zimmerman ONLY by Zimmerman’s self defense use of a handgun – judged legally, THEN Zimmerman was NOT victim of a deadly lethal-force physical beating (beating to death with bare hands) by Martin. Either Zimmerman’s physical injuries were self inflicted or occurred elsewhere previously and very recent. It seems the proper line if the City was truly trying to make case against Zimmerman as guilty that the few questions would have directly been in challenging medical evidence as “Is it not possible Mr. Zimmerman approached Mr. Martin and bashed his own nose and fell to the ground bashing his own head on the sidewalk, all the time holding Mr. Martin and then rose and shot him?” “Is it not possible Mr.Zimmerman’s wounds were self-inflicted?” “Is it not possible Mr.Zimmerman had received these wounds just previously in a described same type altercation whereby Mr.Zimmerman was being beat to death within an inch of his life and let go and Mr.Zimmerman afterwards approached Mr.Martin and shot him dead with no physical contact except to perhaps grab him and throw him to the ground and step on his hand?”

So the two weights in the Scales of Justice. We remove the one weight and say Martin was not in the act of homicide via physical beating to death of victim, THEN we have to remove the other and accuse Zimmerman as being a liar and falsely swearing as to all his injuries and how and when they occurred. We are left with pre-meditated murder one. If Martin is innocent then Zimmerman is guilty. Considering Zimmerman’s background then is that too much of a jump in criminal behavior to be believable? That he falsified or lied about injuries and committed murder out of contempt for Martin and anyone like him? That is the other responsible question.

This case seemed too light, not exhaustively pursued. Not comprehensive. I followed the O.J. Simpson Case and did not miss a second, as was broadcasted live in full, and kept daily notes. I believed O.J. was innocent and so did the Jury. Here admittedly I skimmed but waited until the end when the actual Trial reports came out with actual content of case. Something is missing. Something seems very light. In the very case of self defense whereby there is a homicide, BOTH backgrounds of BOTH subjects have to presented exhaustively with all appropriate analysis of both. There has been a homicide with only one person’s word as to how it occurred.

Lethal deadly force as self defense legally is in some vein related to capital offenses in America whereby the punishment is death for the crimes and is the Law of the Land regardless of any States wishes to the contrary as they are legally obligated to have in place a republican form of governement of the US Constitution ONLY. Whereby two witnesses or more are necessary for conviction of Treason as Due Process in America with aspect of death penalty, there is also actual Declaration of War as defense of the Nation against Treason as defined as levying war against America – the world as witness.

But here simply Mr. George Zimmerman’s statement of the facts seemed the only acceptance of truth of the events. This is an inequality in the Law and Scales of Justice. It is unaccebtable in Christian religion as well – there must be at least two witnesses in cases. …..
DEUTERONOMY Chapter 17
6 At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses, shall he that is worthy of death be put to death; but at the mouth of one witness he shall not be put to death.

This case needs more intense scrutiny and review and apparently an appropriate retrial of facts. It is simply unbelievable T. Martin intended homicide by I would estimate virtually all qualified opinion.

 

SPECIAL REPLY…. THIS HAS BEEN A POSSIBLE DANGEROUS PRECEDENT – THE SLAYING OF TRAYVON MARTIN IN FLORIDA – WHICH COULD (or has?) ESCALTE TO DANGEROUS DEADLY VIGILANTE-ISM IN AMERICA BY THESE CITIZEN WATCH GROUPS WHICH ARE NOT DULY SWORN IN OFFICERS OF THE JUSTICE SYSTEM OF AMERICA (POLICE). IT SHOULD BE REDRESS FOR GRIEVANCE AND LAW (actually is) THAT NO CITIZEN OR CITIZEN GROUP SHOULD HAVE ANY POWERS AS AGENT OR OFFICERS OF THE COURT OTHER THAN NORMAL CRIME REPORTING TO POLICE AS ANY CITIZEN. THEY SHOULD NOT BE ABLE TO BEAR ARMS IN DEFENSE OF RESIDENTIAL LIFE LIMB AND PROPERTY. THEY SHOULD HAVE NO POWER OF ARREST OR DETAINMNET.

THE DANGERS….. WE REMEMBER AND CALL TO REMEMBERENCE IN RECENT HISTORY THE DEATH SQUAD STREET SWEEPERS IN SOUTH AMERICA AND AS RECENT HISTORY…..
“In its 2003 and 2002 world reports, Human Rights Watch reported the existence of death squads in several Venezuelan states, involving members of the local police, the DISIP and the National Guard. These groups were responsible for the extrajudicial killings of civilians and wanted or alleged criminals, including street criminals, looters and drug users.[19][20]”
SOURCE:
Death squad
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_squad

 EVERYONE HAS HEARD OF THIS DANGEROUS DEADLY ESCALATION IN OUR PREVIOUS 1960s GENERATION BY OUR OWN NATIONAL GUARD IN OHIO – THE KENT STATE UNIVERSITY MASSACRE MAY 04 1970 – UNARMED COLLEGE STUDENTS SHOT DEAD 4, WOUNDED 9. – THE “KENT STATE MASSACRE”
Kent State shootings
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_State_shootings
AUDIO http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68g76j9VBvM
VIDEO http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dj06QNXuWps
VIDEO http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5H8izrhFNy8

eMinister of eChurchofPhiladelphia.Org
http://echurchofphiladelphia.org/
Outreach – ChristianEministry.Com
http://christianeministry.com/
Podcasts:
ChristianEministry.Com Podcasts
eMinister,eChurchOfPhiladelphia.Org
RSS
http://www.cyberears.com/podcasts/podcast_5772.xml
Bible Studies: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ChristianEministry/
RSS http://rss.groups.yahoo.com/group/ChristianEministry/rss
Forums / Studies Posted:
eChurchOfPhiladelphia.Org eChurch Forums
http://churchphilaforums.freesmfhosting.com/index.php

Comments Off on Who Was Innocent – Trayvon Martin, George Zimmerman

Filed under BlogPosts

Podcast Posted: Boston Marathon Bombers Enemies Of Peace


Podcast Posted: Boston Marathon Bombers Enemies Of Peace

Name: BostonMarathonBombersEnemiesOfPeace.mp3

Description: Boston Marathon Bombers, Enemies Of Peace. A read along and elaboration of our BlogPost in MP3 Audio. Supporting Scripture verses of the theme message and as an over all look at these attacks and acts altogether simply as the Enemies of World Peace.

BLOG: http://christianeministry.com/2013/04/21/boston-marathon-bombers-the-enemies-of-peace/

)))>PLAY: http://www.cyberears.com/cybrss/18555.mp3

OR;

(((LISTEN ONLINE: http://www.cyberears.com/index.php/Browse/playaudio/18555

PODCAST HOMEPAGE: ChristianEministry.Com Podcasts http://www.cyberears.com/index.php/Show/audio/5772

HOME: ChristianEministry.Com http://christianeministry.com/

Comments Off on Podcast Posted: Boston Marathon Bombers Enemies Of Peace

Filed under ANNOUNCE, BlogPosts